The existance of science (the existance of philosophy) came from a lot of proven evidence (they have to), that makes the fact a fact; the existance of a religion (the existance of GOD) came from no evidence ever says that it is wrong, that makes the belief a belief.
Their origin is different, in a way, the faith of human to a religion is pretty "scientifically logical", well, a good scienctist never say it is wrong unless he/she can prove it.
Anyway, i am just one of the many atheist out there. because i study science and trained in science, i believe in sth call evidence and fact. though i can't prove a religion wrong either, I don't believe in GOD while I do accept its existance in the heart of many ppl.
for the sake of social harmony, this shldn't be the topic because there are forever parallel and you will never find them meet each other. the believer uses the heart.
but the disbeliever uses the brain.
as a biomedical student, the brain and the heart is equally important physiologically, at least to me.
4 comments:
hahaha then u go "kao chim"??? atheist will go kao chim one meh?? :P
-cm-
i kao for you you still banyak gigat??! next time no more!!.....err, the one for myself is shun bian only k...:P
hahaha shun bian only ar? okielor next time u shun bian help me kao again oso hahaha...:P
-cm-
don't try if you were trying to console yourself or to examine her accuracy....i know what you want to know :P
Post a Comment